Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether revised rules 15 and 16 of the Turnover and Assessment Rules, framed under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, were invalid for want of reservation for the President's consideration and assent under Article 286(3) of the Constitution of India after the Essential Goods (Declaration and Regulation of Tax on Sale or Purchase) Act, 1952 came into force.
Analysis: The rules governed the single-point levy on hides and skins and were framed under the rule-making power conferred by the pre-Constitution Act. The decision distinguished between a law made by the State Legislature imposing or authorising a tax and subordinate legislation made under an existing Act. It held that, even if the rules operated as part of the charging mechanism for hides and skins, they remained delegated legislation and not a law passed by the State Legislature. The earlier State Act was an existing law, and the later rules, being made in exercise of that pre-existing delegated power, did not require a fresh presidential reservation and assent merely because the parliamentary declaration of essential goods was in force when they were promulgated.
Conclusion: The impugned rules were valid and were not hit by Article 286(3) of the Constitution of India.