Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales of beedi were liable to tax under section 5(vii) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act on the footing that the clause applied to the first sale effected in the State of Madras by a dealer who was not exempt from taxation.
Analysis: The expression "first sale" was held to distinguish the sale taxable under the provision from other sales of the same goods effected in the State. The clause was read as containing three requirements: the sale must be the first sale, it must be effected within the State of Madras, and it must be by a dealer not exempt from taxation. On that construction, the petitioner's sales satisfied the statutory conditions and were within the charging provision.
Conclusion: The sales effected by the petitioner were liable to assessment under section 5(vii) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, and the revision was decided against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: The phrase "first sale effected in the State" identifies the taxable point in a chain of sales and attracts tax where the sale is the earliest taxable sale within the State by a dealer not exempt from tax.