TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court rules DCTO can't order payment under Madras Sales Tax Act; plaintiff wins costs.</h1> <h3>Ineepakolla Ganiraju Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh</h3> The High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer cannot order an assessee to pay a specified sum under section 16 of the ... - The High Court of Andhra Pradesh held that the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer cannot pass an order directing an assessee to pay a specified sum under section 16 of the Madras General Sales Tax Act. The section only allows for actual compounding of offenses through voluntary payment accepted by the officer. The court allowed the appeal and decreed in favor of the plaintiff with costs throughout. Leave to appeal was refused. (Case citation: 1958 (10) TMI 34 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
