Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declaration made under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 was false so as to justify rejection of the certificate and whether the assessee was entitled to issuance of Form 4 certificate.
Analysis: The declaration was made in respect of a pending writ petition concerning the challenge to Explanation (aa) to section 80HHC and the consequential restraint against reopening assessments for the relevant years. A certificate issued under section 90(1) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998 is conclusive as to the matters stated therein and cannot be reopened except on the ground of false declaration. On the record, the declaration could not be treated as false, and the rejection order was therefore unsustainable.
Conclusion: The rejection of the certificate was quashed and the assessee was held entitled to the certificate in Form 4 under rule 5(b) of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998.