Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on finalisation of provisional assessment, the excess duty paid on some clearances could be adjusted against short payment on other clearances and, if so, whether the demand for differential duty was sustainable.
Analysis: The dispute arose from provisional assessment of goods supplied to a sister unit for captive consumption, where valuation was worked out on the basis applicable to captive clearances and the cost of production was finalised later. On finalisation, some clearances showed excess payment and others showed short payment. The Tribunal held that in such a situation the short payment had to be adjusted against the excess payment, and only the net differential, if any, could be demanded. Since the exercise was one of finalisation of provisional assessment, the overall position was revenue neutral and the demand could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The excess duty was required to be adjusted against the short payment, and the demand for differential duty was not justified.