Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a revisional court could apply a subsequent retrospective validating enactment to uphold sales tax assessments on inter-State sales that had been excluded by the appellate tribunal under the then-existing law.
Analysis: The turnover in dispute represented sales of cotton purchased outside the State but delivered within the State for consumption, which had initially been treated as outside the tax net by reference to the constitutional ban under Article 286(2). A later validating enactment removed that ban retrospectively for the relevant period and operated upon assessments that had earlier been held invalid. The revisional jurisdiction under section 12-B was treated as appellate in character for this purpose, enabling the High Court to take account of the law as retrospectively altered. Once the validating provision is given effect, the earlier appellate order becomes inconsistent with the law deemed to have been in force on the relevant date.
Conclusion: The retrospective validating enactment applied to the pending revision, the exclusion of the disputed turnover was erroneous in law, and the assessment was upheld in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A revisional court exercising appellate-like powers may apply a retrospective validating statute, and an order consistent with the law as it stood before such enactment can be corrected if the later law deems the assessment lawful from the earlier date.