Property in goods and reservation of disposal rights defeated intrastate sales tax on jaggery transactions.

Property in goods passes under the parties' intention under section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, and sections 23 and 25 apply only to unconditional appropriation without reservation of the right of disposal. On the stated facts, the seller took railway receipts in its own name, retained control until payment was made through the bank, and withheld delivery until the balance price was realised, showing reservation of jus disponendi. The sales were therefore completed outside the State, and the transactions were not taxable as sales within the State under section 2(h) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act. The State was held to have no power to levy tax on these transactions, leaving the refund decrees undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sales of jaggery were completed within the State so as to attract tax under section 2(h) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, and whether the property in the goods passed within the State under the Sale of Goods Act.

Analysis: The determining question was when property in the goods passed. Under section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, the intention of the parties governs the time of transfer of property, and sections 23 and 25 operate only where there is unconditional appropriation without reservation of the right of disposal. The goods were selected and weighed, but the railway receipts were taken in the seller's name, the buyers obtained delivery only after payment through the bank, and the seller retained control until the balance price was realised. Those circumstances showed reservation of jus disponendi and negatived unconditional appropriation within the State. The debits in the account books and other trade incidents did not alter that conclusion.

Conclusion: The sales were completed only outside the State when delivery was obtained on payment, so the transactions were not taxable as sales within the State; the finding is in favour of the respondents.

Final Conclusion: The State had no power to levy sales tax on these transactions, and the dismissal of the appeals left the trial court's decrees for refund undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Property in goods passes only when the parties so intend, and where the seller retains the right of disposal by taking railway receipts in his own name and withholding delivery until full payment, there is no unconditional appropriation within the State for sales tax purposes.

---