Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a members' club supplying goods to its members can be treated as a dealer carrying on business under the sales tax law, and whether the writ petition challenging registration and assessment could succeed on the material before the Court.
Analysis: The definition of dealer required the carrying on of the business of selling or supplying goods, and the reference to a club in the definition had to be read consistently with that requirement. A club supplying goods to members would attract liability only if such supplies were made as a business. On the material placed before the Court, the existence or absence of a profit-making motive could not be determined, and the earlier registration order had not been challenged through the statutory appellate remedy. The Court therefore declined to interfere in writ jurisdiction on an incomplete factual record.
Conclusion: The petitioner failed to establish that the impugned registration and assessment were erroneous on the record before the Court, and the writ petition was dismissed.
Final Conclusion: The decision left the factual question of business activity open, but upheld the refusal of writ relief and left the statutory action undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: A club is liable to be treated as a dealer only if its supply of goods to members is shown to be carried on as a business.