Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court upholds sales tax assessment on local and out-of-state sales, dismissing lack of material argument. Assessee ordered to pay costs.</h1> The court upheld the assessment of sales tax on local sales and linseed despatched outside Bihar, ruling in favor of the State of Bihar. The petitioner ... - Issues Involved:1. Whether there is any material to support the assessment of sales tax upon the petitioner firm on a turnover of goods worth two lacs for local sale.2. Whether the assessment of sales tax upon linseed to the value of Rs. 1,24,998 despatched outside the State of Bihar is legally valid.3. Whether there is any material to support the contention of the assessee firm that the quantity of linseed to the extent of Rs. 1,24,998 has been sold outside the State of Bihar.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Material to Support Assessment of Sales Tax on Local SalesThe petitioner firm, Debulal Gudarmal, did not furnish quarterly returns or produce account books for the period from 1st April 1949 to 31st March 1950. Consequently, the Superintendent of Sales Tax made an assessment to the best of his judgment, determining the gross turnover to be Rs. 11,51,890 and the taxable turnover for local sales to be Rs. 1,80,000. The petitioner argued there was no material to support the assessment for local sales, claiming all business was conducted outside Bihar. However, the court found sufficient material to support the assessment, including a report by the Inspector dated 10th February 1950 and a surprise visit by the Superintendent on 11th August 1950. The Inspector's report noted the dealer's significant local business activities and estimated a monthly gross turnover of Rs. 30,000. The court concluded that there was material to support the assessment of sales tax on a turnover of goods worth two lacs for local sales and answered this issue in favor of the State of Bihar.Issue 2: Legal Validity of Sales Tax Assessment on Linseed Despatched Outside BiharThe petitioner argued that the sale of linseed worth Rs. 1,24,998 occurred outside Bihar and should not be taxed by the state. The court examined the despatch records and noted that most consignments were made to 'self,' implying a reservation of the right of disposal within the meaning of Section 25 of the Sale of Goods Act. There was no material to show how the railway receipts were endorsed. The court held that in the absence of such material, it could not be accepted that the title to the goods passed outside Bihar. The court also referenced Section 2(g) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, which extends the definition of 'sale' to include goods in Bihar at the time of the contract, regardless of the delivery location. Therefore, the assessment of sales tax on linseed despatched outside Bihar was deemed legally valid, and this issue was answered in favor of the State of Bihar.Issue 3: Material to Support Contention of Sales Outside BiharThe petitioner contended that the linseed worth Rs. 1,24,998 was sold outside Bihar. The court found no material to support this contention, noting that the railway receipts were not made out in the purchaser's name and there was no evidence of how they were endorsed. The court concluded that there was no material to support the claim that the linseed was sold outside Bihar. This issue was also answered in favor of the State of Bihar.Conclusion:All three questions referred by the Board of Revenue were answered against the assessee and in favor of the State of Bihar. The court upheld the assessment of sales tax on both local sales and linseed despatched outside Bihar. The assessee was ordered to pay the cost of the reference, with a hearing fee of Rs. 250.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found