Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amended requirement of pre-deposit for admission of a second appeal governed the assessee's appeal, or whether the appeal remained governed by section 22(1) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act as it stood when the returns were filed.
Analysis: The right of appeal and the conditions attached to it had to be examined with reference to the statutory position existing when the returns were filed. The provision then in force required only payment of the amount admitted to be due as a condition for entertaining the appeal. The later amendment, which drew a distinction between first and second appeals and imposed a stricter form of proof of payment, did not govern the assessee's already accrued position. The old section was wide enough to cover the second appeal before the Commissioner, and the rules providing for that appeal could be read with the earlier statutory provision.
Conclusion: The appeal was governed by the unamended section 22(1), and the assessee was not bound to deposit the assessed tax beyond the amount admitted by him to be due. The petition succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: The right of appeal, and the statutory conditions attached to its exercise, are governed by the law in force when the relevant returns were filed, unless the amended law clearly makes the change retrospective.