Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether arecanuts that were peeled, sliced, boiled and dried before sale remained horticultural produce within the proviso to section 2(1) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act.
Analysis: The exclusion from turnover under the proviso was intended for agricultural or horticultural produce grown by the assessee, and a narrow reading would defeat that object. The processing applied to the arecanuts was the minimum necessary to make them marketable and did not amount to manufacture or change the real character of the commodity. The produce remained the same horticultural produce despite curing, since the process was only preservative and consistent with local agricultural practice.
Conclusion: The processed arecanuts continued to be horticultural produce within the meaning of the proviso to section 2(1), and the Government's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The petition was dismissed, and the assessee retained the benefit of the statutory exclusion from taxable turnover.
Ratio Decidendi: Where agricultural or horticultural produce undergoes only the minimum processing necessary to render it marketable, without amounting to manufacture or altering its essential character, it retains its character as agricultural or horticultural produce for the purpose of the sales tax exclusion.