Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts collected by a dealer by way of tax and deemed to form part of his turnover under section 2 of Act XVII of 1954 were liable only to the basic tax under section 3(1)(b) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, or also to the additional tax under section 3(2)(iv) of that Act.
Analysis: The amounts collected by way of tax, though separately shown in the bill, formed part of the price paid by the purchaser and therefore constituted part of the consideration for the sale. Once section 2 of Act XVII of 1954 deemed those amounts to form part of the dealer's turnover, they fell within the statutory concept of total turnover and were not to be isolated from the sale price for the purpose of levy. The expression "total turnover" had to be read with the definitions of "sale" and "turnover" in the Act, and the additional levy under section 3(2)(iv) attached where the goods sold themselves attracted that levy.
Conclusion: The amounts collected by way of tax were liable to the additional levy under section 3(2)(iv), and not merely to the basic tax under section 3(1)(b).
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was rejected, and the revisions succeeded on the question of liability to the additional tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts collected by a dealer from the purchaser as tax, when statutorily deemed to form part of turnover, remain part of the consolidated sale consideration and are liable to every tax levy that attaches to the taxable turnover of the goods sold.