Registered manufacturer status was required at the time of manufacture to claim deduction under the sales tax rules.

Rule 22(2) of the Travancore General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1124, linked the deduction for cocoanut or groundnut oil and cake to a dealer who was already registered as a manufacturer when the goods were manufactured. Rule 22(1) permitted a manufacturer to seek registration, and the structure of rule 22, including the monthly statement requirement, showed that the benefit was not retrospective. A dealer who obtained registration only later could not claim deduction for an earlier manufacturing period, and the claim for that period failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a dealer claiming deduction under rule 22(2) of the Travancore General Sales Tax (Turnover and Assessment) Rules, 1124, had to be a registered manufacturer at the time of manufacture, or whether subsequent registration before final assessment was sufficient.

Analysis: Rule 7 permitted deduction of amounts that a registered manufacturer of cocoanut or groundnut oil and cake was entitled to deduct under rule 22, subject to the conditions of that rule. Rule 22(1) enabled a dealer manufacturing the relevant oil and cake to apply for registration as a manufacturer. Rule 22(2) granted the deduction to "every such manufacturer" in respect of oil and cake converted by him, showing that the benefit attached to a person already registered as a manufacturer and to the manufacture made in that status. The structure of rule 22, including the obligation to furnish monthly statements under sub-rule (3), confirmed that the statutory benefit was linked to prior registration and could not be extended retrospectively merely because registration was later obtained.

Conclusion: The petitioner was required to be a registered manufacturer at the time of manufacture to claim the deduction under rule 22(2), and subsequent registration did not entitle him to retrospective relief. The claim for deduction for the earlier period failed.

---