Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a best judgment assessment under section 11(2) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, was valid when the dealer had applied for registration but the authority delayed grant of registration.
Analysis: At the material time, the statutory scheme did not authorise assessment merely because the dealer had not been registered; it proceeded on the basis of failure to apply for registration. The dealer had in fact applied for registration, and the delay in issuing the certificate was attributable to the taxing authority. The authority also exceeded its limited function by embarking on an unnecessary inquiry into antecedents instead of confining itself to the registration application. In these circumstances, the assessment for the period during which the benefit of registration was wrongly withheld could not be sustained, and the provision as it then stood did not confer jurisdiction for the assessment made.
Conclusion: The assessment was invalid and the orders under challenge were set aside in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory precondition for best judgment assessment is not met and the dealer's inability to obtain registration is due to administrative delay, the assessing authority lacks jurisdiction to make the assessment under that provision.