Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Indian Coffee Board, constituted under the Coffee Market Expansion Act, 1942, was a "dealer" within the meaning of Section 2(b) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, so as to be liable to sales tax on the turnover arising from sales of coffee from the surplus pool.
Analysis: The statutory scheme showed that coffee produced by registered owners was divided into an internal quota and surplus coffee, and that the surplus coffee had to be delivered to the Board. Once delivered to the pool, the registered owner retained no rights except a right to receive the prescribed payments. The Board had control over the surplus pool, was responsible for storage, curing and marketing, and sold the coffee in the course of collective marketing. The Board was treated as the effective owner of the coffee for purposes of sale, and the sales were carried on in a commercial sense. The contention that the Board acted merely as an agent of the producers was rejected because the statute created no agency relationship and the producers had no continuing proprietary rights in the pooled coffee.
Conclusion: The Board was a dealer within Section 2(b) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939, and the sales tax assessment on its turnover was valid.