Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued by the Assistant Commissioner to produce books and documents for reopening an already completed assessment was without jurisdiction because the Commissioner had directed such action without first hearing the assessee.
Analysis: The power to require production of accounts under Section 15(1) of the Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947, could be exercised only for purposes of the Act. The proposed reopening was connected with the Commissioner's revisional power under Section 22(5) of the Act, which was a judicial power and, by virtue of Section 22(7), could not be exercised without hearing the person affected. The direction to the Assistant Commissioner, though described as administrative, could not be so treated, because the Act contained no such separate administrative power and the notice to produce documents was dependent on a valid judicial step under the revisional provision. As the assessee had not been heard before the direction was issued, the proceedings initiated on that basis lacked jurisdiction.
Conclusion: The notice and the proceedings taken pursuant to the Commissioner's direction were without jurisdiction and the assessee was not bound to comply.
Ratio Decidendi: A revisional direction affecting an assessee's rights must be made in exercise of the statutory judicial power and only after hearing the assessee; a notice to produce documents issued without such hearing is without jurisdiction.