Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the absence of the statutory notice under Section 13(2) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, the Sales Tax Officer had jurisdiction to complete the assessment and whether the assessment could nevertheless be sustained despite the omission of notice.
Analysis: Section 13 forms part of the machinery for assessment and does not itself create the charging liability, which arises under the charging provisions of the Act. The issue whether a notice under Section 13(2)(a) is a condition precedent to jurisdiction was answered in the negative. However, the Court also examined the facts of the case and found that the assessee had not been shown to have had a fair opportunity to produce the relevant books and papers for the period in question. On that footing, the omission to issue the statutory notice caused prejudice. The distinction was drawn between the existence of jurisdiction in law and the validity of the particular assessment made in the circumstances of the case.
Conclusion: The absence of notice did not destroy the authority to assess in law, but the assessment made on the facts was invalid because the assessee was prejudiced by the omission; the matter was required to start again from the stage of issuing notice under Section 13(2)(a).
Ratio Decidendi: A procedural notice under the assessment machinery provision does not by itself create or defeat taxing jurisdiction, but an assessment made without the required notice may still be invalid if the omission has caused prejudice to the assessee in the particular case.