Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appointment of a secured creditor as the operating agency under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 was valid, and whether the directions relating to the special investigative audit and choice of chartered accountants suffered from legal infirmity or prejudice.
Analysis: Section 16(2) vested the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction with power to appoint an operating agency to conduct the inquiry and collect material relevant to the question whether the company was a sick industrial company. Section 27 did not prohibit such appointment, and Regulation 40 only enabled the Board to seek assistance from financial institutions, banks, consultants, experts and other professionals. The fact that the appointed institution was also a secured creditor did not, by itself, create a disqualification or establish bias, especially where safeguards were built into the process. The special investigative audit was to be conducted by independent chartered accountants selected through a controlled process, and the parties were given opportunity to place materials and file objections to the report.
Conclusion: The appointment of the operating agency was valid and no legal prejudice or bias was shown; the challenge to the impugned order failed.
Ratio Decidendi: The Board may appoint a notified institution, including a secured creditor, as operating agency under section 16(2) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, and may delegate ancillary fact-finding functions with safeguards, unless actual legal prohibition or demonstrated prejudice is shown.