Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment year despite non-fulfilment of the statutory condition regarding the number of workers under section 80J(4)(iv), merely because the relief had been allowed in the initial assessment year.
Analysis: The deduction under section 80J is available only where the industrial undertaking satisfies the conditions prescribed in sub-section (4). Clause (iv) requires, in a case of manufacture or production with the aid of power, employment of ten or more workers, and without the aid of power, twenty or more workers. The court found that this condition was not fulfilled in the year under consideration, and the assessee's claim could not be sustained on the basis that relief had been allowed in an earlier year.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to deduction under section 80J for the year in question; the question was answered in the negative and in favour of the Revenue.