Ruling partly allows taxpayer, deletes Rs.3.54 crore reduction under s.80-IA(10)/s.10B(7); scrap sales nondeductible; ad hoc 5% interest deduction disallowed

ITAT (Chennai) allowed the taxpayer's appeal partly by deleting the AO's reduction of eligible 10B profits by Rs.3.54 crore under s.80-IA(10)/s.10B(7), finding the AO failed to justify or compute "ordinary" profits and transfer-pricing comparability issues. It upheld the CIT(A)'s view that scrap sales are not profits of the 100% EOUs for s.10B purposes and thus not deductible, and confirmed the assessment treating scrap proceeds as income from other sources. The tribunal reversed the allowance of a notional 5% expenditure on interest income, holding no ad hoc deduction is permissible; Revenue's appeal on that point succeeded.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Denial of deduction under Section 10B for profits in excess of the Arm's Length Price (ALP).
2. Treatment of income from scrap sales.
3. Levy of interest under Sections 234B, 234C, and 234D.
4. Allowance of 5% expenditure on interest income.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Denial of Deduction under Section 10B for Profits in Excess of ALP:
The assessee contested the CIT(A)'s decision to uphold the AO's denial of deduction under Section 10B for profits exceeding the ALP by invoking Section 10B(7) read with Section 80-IA(10). The AO had referred the case to the TPO due to foreign transactions, and the TPO found no need for adjustments to the international transaction values. However, the TPO noted that the assessee's Profit Level Indicator (PLI) was significantly higher than the mean PLI of comparable companies. The AO adopted the assessee's working of excess profit at Rs. 3.54 crores and reduced this from the eligible profit for deduction under Section 10B, assessing it under "Income from other sources." The CIT(A) partially upheld this by reducing only 83.1% of Rs. 3.54 crores from the eligible profit.

The Tribunal found that the TPO had confirmed the ALP and no adjustment was necessary. The AO's application of Section 80-IA(10) was deemed unsustainable as he failed to specify why he believed the profits were inflated and did not provide a basis for determining ordinary profits. The Tribunal deleted the reduction of Rs. 3.54 crores from the eligible profits.

2. Treatment of Income from Scrap Sales:
The assessee argued that income from scrap sales should be considered business income eligible for deduction under Section 10B. The AO and CIT(A) treated scrap sales as "Income from other sources," and the Tribunal upheld this view. It was noted that scrap sales do not qualify as profits derived from a 100% export-oriented undertaking, and the assessee had originally classified this income under "Income from other sources" in its return. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s findings, disallowing the deduction under Section 10B for scrap sales.

3. Levy of Interest under Sections 234B, 234C, and 234D:
The Tribunal noted that the levy of interest under Sections 234B, 234C, and 234D is consequential in nature. No substantial arguments were presented on this issue, and the Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s findings.

4. Allowance of 5% Expenditure on Interest Income:
The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s direction to allow 5% of the interest income as expenditure. The Departmental Representative argued that the assessee did not provide evidence of incurring such expenditure and had already claimed all expenses in computing business income. The Tribunal found merit in this argument, noting that the Act does not provide for ad hoc estimated expenditure without evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)'s decision and disallowed the 5% expenditure on interest income.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of both the assessee and the Revenue. The reduction of Rs. 3.54 crores from the eligible profits under Section 10B was deleted, the treatment of scrap sales as "Income from other sources" was upheld, and the allowance of 5% expenditure on interest income was disallowed. The levy of interest under Sections 234B, 234C, and 234D was confirmed as consequential.

---