1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal grants full waiver of pre-deposit, clarifies product distinction</h1> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, granting a full waiver of the pre-deposit of the dues demanded in the impugned order. The Tribunal ... Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Spent Methanol Issues:Excisability of spent Methanol cleared by the applicants.Analysis:Issue: Excisability of spent MethanolThe issue in this case revolves around the excisability of the spent Methanol cleared by the applicants. The applicants, engaged in manufacturing bulk drugs and intermediaries, used methanol as a solvent. The contention was that as methanol became impure over time during the manufacturing process, they cleared the spent methanol. The Revenue argued that duty was payable on the spent methanol. The learned Advocate for the applicants relied on several Tribunal decisions favoring the assessee in similar cases. The Tribunal noted that spent methanol is a waste product and clarified that the manufactured product was not spent methanol but rather distilled and purified. The Tribunal found no manufacturing process involved as the input itself was methanol. Considering the arguments and precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicants, granting a full waiver of the pre-deposit of the dues demanded in the impugned order. The Tribunal also directed that no coercive measures should be taken by the Revenue until the appeal's disposal, with the stay order continuing even after 180 days.---