Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of customs duty, excise duty and penalty was justified on the ground of a prima facie case and severe financial hardship.
Analysis: The demand on capital goods was treated as prima facie covered by the Tribunal's earlier decision relied on by the appellant. On the question of financial inability, the order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal showed that the unit had already been proceeded against by a bank and that directions had been issued affecting its immovable and movable assets. In these circumstances, the applicant was found to have established severe financial hardship warranting relief at the stay stage.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of the demanded amounts was stayed till disposal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Pre-deposit may be waived where the appellant shows a prima facie arguable case and severe financial hardship.