Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for capital gains purposes, transfer under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 arises on parting with possession of only a portion of immovable property in part performance of a written agreement, and whether the consideration is to be computed proportionately for the portion actually transferred.
Analysis: The agreement was in writing and disclosed a completed arrangement in terms of section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Possession of only a part of the property was handed over in pursuance of that agreement, and the statutory definition of transfer under section 2(47)(v) extends to such delivery of possession. Once that statutory transfer occurs, capital gains are chargeable in the year in which the possession is handed over. The contract could be treated in parts where the facts and agreement show that possession of only a defined portion was transferred, and the sale consideration was capable of allocation on a proportionate basis.
Conclusion: The transfer for capital gains purposes was confined to the portion of property whose possession was handed over, and the consideration was rightly taken on a proportionate basis. The issue was decided against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.