Interest on reversed Cenvat credit depends on prior statutory demand and no utilisation before reversal.

Interest on wrongly taken Cenvat credit was stated to be unrecoverable where the credit was reversed soon after the error was noticed and there was no finding that it had been utilised. The text explains that interest liability depends on prior determination of the duty demand under the statutory recovery mechanism corresponding to Section 11A, read with the central excise recovery rules. On that basis, reversal of the excess credit before utilisation was treated as negating interest liability, and the demand was removed in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether interest was payable on excess Cenvat credit reversed after the lapse was pointed out, in the absence of determination of duty demand under the statutory recovery provisions and where the credit was stated to have remained unutilised.

Analysis: The excess credit was reversed soon after the defect was noticed. The decision turned on the statutory scheme governing recovery of wrongly taken credit and the levy of interest. It was held that interest cannot be demanded unless the demand is first determined under the recovery provision corresponding to Section 11A. The relevant rules, read with the Central Excise recovery provisions, were held to require such prior determination. The case law relied upon supported the view that where the credit is reversed and there is no finding of utilisation, no interest liability arises.

Conclusion: Interest was not leviable on the reversed excess credit and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appellate relief granted removed the interest demand and the connected adverse orders could not be sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Interest on wrongly taken credit cannot be demanded unless the statutory demand is first determined under the recovery provision, and reversal of the credit before utilisation negates interest liability.

---