Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, on the facts of the case, the assessee had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the demand and penalty pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The disputed credit related to common inputs used in exempted and dutiable products, and the amount of credit involved was about Rs. 7.5 lakhs, whereas the demand raised was about Rs. 1.4 crores with equal penalty. The Tribunal treated this as a relevant factor in assessing prima facie hardship and also noted that similar relief had been granted in comparable cases. The objection that the assessee should have maintained separate accounts was noted, but the factual dispute on that aspect was left for final hearing. The reliance placed on the Rajasthan High Court decision was distinguished as concerning the condition of a notification requiring reversal before removal of goods.
Conclusion: The assessee was held to have established a prima facie case, pre-deposit was waived, and recovery of the impugned dues was stayed until disposal of the appeal.