Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the trust was a private family trust and not a public religious trust so as to deny exemption under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The trust deed and scheme showed that the temples and the school were described as belonging to the Kovilakam, the trustees and their representatives were restricted to members of the family, and the income from the acquired school property was to be used only for the temples. The public being allowed to enter the temples or participate in festivals did not alter the character of the trust. On the terms of the award and scheme, the trust was created for permanent management of family properties and was not established for the public at large.
Conclusion: The trust was held to be a private family trust and not a public religious trust, and exemption under section 11 was not available.