Mizoram residents subject to Wealth-tax Act despite absence of specific notification

The court held that the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 is applicable to Mizoram residents, rejecting the petitioner's arguments based on the absence of a presidential notification and the exemption under the Income-tax Act. The court clarified that specific notification was not required for applying Central Acts to Mizoram, except under Article 371G. It also ruled that the Doctrine of Desuetude did not prevent the enforcement of the Wealth-tax Act in Mizoram. The court emphasized that the Wealth-tax Act applies to Mizoram, including scheduled tribe members, and dismissed the writ petition, vacating any interim orders.

---

---

Issues:
- Applicability of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 on Mizos residing in Mizoram
- Requirement for notification by the President of India to apply Central Acts to Mizoram
- Exemption of scheduled tribe members from Wealth-tax Act based on Income-tax Act provisions
- Doctrine of Desuetude and its applicability to the Wealth-tax Act in Mizoram

Analysis:
The petitioner challenged the applicability of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 on Mizos in Mizoram, citing the absence of a notification by the President of India for Central Acts to apply in Mizoram. The petitioner argued that due to the exemption of scheduled tribe members from income tax under the Income-tax Act, the Wealth-tax Act should not be applicable to him. Additionally, the petitioner invoked the doctrine of Desuetude, claiming that the Act was not applied in Mizoram for 40 years, thus should not be enforced without proper notification.

The court examined the historical background of Mizoram's legal status under various Acts and regulations, leading to its current status as a full-fledged State under the Union of India. The key question was the post-Indian Constitution requirements for applying Central laws to Mizoram, considering the unique provisions of the Fifth and Sixth Schedules. The petitioner argued that the President's power to extend Central Acts to these areas should be exercised in consultation with the Council of Ministers to protect the interests of aboriginal people permanently residing in these regions.

In response, the respondent contended that the necessity to exempt or apply laws to a specific area arises only when those laws are already in application. The court referred to the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act, 1971, which empowered the President to direct the application of Acts to autonomous districts in Mizoram, with the discretion to specify exceptions or modifications. The interpretation of the word "may" in this context was crucial, with the petitioner urging it to be read as "shall" to ensure the intended protection.

The court analyzed the constitutional provisions, including Article 371G, which provided special protections to Mizoram regarding certain Acts of Parliament. It clarified that no specific notification was required from the President to apply a Central Act to Mizoram unless covered under Article 371G. The court also dismissed the petitioner's argument regarding the Doctrine of Desuetude, stating that the Wealth-tax Act was indeed in application in Mizoram.

Regarding the exemption under the Income-tax Act for scheduled tribe members in specified areas, the court highlighted that such exemptions did not automatically extend to the Wealth-tax Act. Wealth accrued from exempted income sources was not exempt from Wealth-tax. The court ultimately dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing that the Wealth-tax Act applied to Mizoram, and any interim orders were vacated.

---