Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the manufactured blanks were, for purposes of the stay petition, prima facie classifiable under Chapter 72 or Chapter 87 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether the extended period of limitation was prima facie invocable.
Analysis: The inputs were admittedly under Chapter 72, and the goods cleared from the factory were blanks meant for further manufacture of parts and components of motor vehicles by the recipient units. On the material before it, the Tribunal found that the blanks had not yet reached the stage of finished parts or components falling under Chapter 87 and were industrial intermediate products requiring further processes. It also noted that any duty paid would be available as Cenvat credit to the recipient units, and that the invocation of the extended period was not, prima facie, justified.
Conclusion: The appellant made out a prima facie case in its favour, and pre-deposit of the adjudged dues was waived with recovery stayed pending disposal of the appeal.