Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted in respect of the interest demand arising from delayed reversal of credit on removal of capital goods.
Analysis: Rule 4(5)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 permits removal of credit-availed capital goods such as jigs and fixtures to a job worker without requiring reversal of credit. On a prima facie view, the same facility could extend to removal of capital goods to a supplier of components who uses them in manufacture for the assessee. The appellant therefore established a prima facie case against the interest demand.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were justified and granted in favour of the assessee.