Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery should be granted in relation to the duty and penalty demand, and whether the imported goods were prima facie entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. dated 01-03-2002.
Analysis: The claimed exemption turned on whether the imported defibrillators and pacemakers answered the description in the relevant notification entry. The lower authorities had denied the benefit by relying on an earlier Tribunal view, but that view had been stayed by the Supreme Court. In light of that stay, the Tribunal treated the earlier view as not presently supporting the Revenue and found a prima facie case for interim relief.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted in favour of the appellant.