Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants were required to make pre-deposit of penalties imposed under the Customs Act, 1962 and the Central Excise Rules, 2002, and whether recovery of the penalties should be stayed during pendency of the appeals.
Analysis: The appellants were penalised on the allegation that they had made only paper entries without any physical receipt or dealing with the goods. The order noted the Revenue's own case that the goods were never physically dealt with by the appellants and only paper entries were made. On that basis, the Larger Bench decision relied upon by the appellants was found to apply prima facie, warranting consideration of waiver of pre-deposit.
Conclusion: The condition of pre-deposit of the penalties was dispensed with and recovery of the penalties was stayed during the pendency of the appeals, in favour of the appellants.