1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Allows Stay for Appellants Facing Penalties for Fake Entries</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad allowed stay petitions for three appellants facing penalties for fake paper entries without physical receipt of ... Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Penalty The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad allowed stay petitions for three appellants who faced penalties for fake paper entries without physical receipt of goods. Penalties were imposed under Section 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found that since the goods were not physically dealt with by the appellants, penalties cannot be imposed. Stay on penalty recovery was granted during the appeal process.