Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether re-credit taken in respect of inputs cleared on payment of duty under Rule 3(4) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001/2002 was admissible, and whether the matter required re-examination.
Analysis: The Board circular relied on by the Revenue concerned unused inputs written off or partially written off in accounts and was not applicable to inputs that had been cleared on payment of appropriate duty on an assessable value determined under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. At the same time, the lower appellate authority had not considered the effect of the larger bench decision cited by the Revenue on the question of suo motu re-credit, and an unchallenged finding of the original authority had also been overlooked. In these circumstances, the controversy required reconsideration in accordance with law and the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh examination.