1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal grants waiver for duty & penalties on Milk Shake Mixes & Fruit Syrups</h1> The Tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit for duty and penalties in a case concerning the classification of 'Milk Shake Mixes' and 'Fruit Syrups.' ... Stay/Dispensation of pre-deposit - Milk shake mixture - Classification of Issues:Classification of 'Milk Shake Mixes' under heading No. 04.04 and Chapter 20 vs. heading No. 1901.19.Classification of 'Flavoured Syrups/Fruit Syrups' under heading No. 04.04 and Chapter 20 vs. sub-heading No. 2108.99.Analysis:The Applicants sought waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties related to the classification of 'Milk Shake Mixes' and 'Flavoured Syrups/Fruit Syrups.' The dispute revolved around whether these products should be classified under specific headings as claimed by the Applicants or under different headings as determined by the Commissioner of Central Excise.The Appellants argued that the classification of 'Milk Shake Mixes' should follow precedents set by previous Tribunal decisions, citing cases such as Nestle India Ltd. v. CCE and Amrit Foods v. CCE. They contended that the products in question fell under specific headings based on their composition and the Tribunal's past rulings.On the other hand, the Revenue representative supported the Commissioner's findings, asserting that 'Milk Shake Mixes' constituted food preparations falling under a different chapter. They also argued against the classification of 'Fruit Syrups' as claimed by the Applicants, emphasizing the specific categorization of such products under Chapter 21.After reviewing the arguments from both sides and examining the records, the Tribunal found merit in the Applicant's reliance on past Tribunal decisions regarding the classification of 'Milk Shake Mixes.' The Tribunal highlighted a specific case where a similar classification had been upheld, indicating a favorable stance towards the Applicant's position.Regarding the classification of 'Fruit Syrups,' the Tribunal noted the distinction between flavoured syrups and fruit syrups under the tariff. Despite the Revenue's objections, the Tribunal preliminarily determined that 'Fruit Syrups' qualified as preparations of fruit falling under Chapter 20, aligning with the Applicant's assertions.Ultimately, the Tribunal granted the waiver of pre-deposit for the balance amount of duty and penalties, considering the amount already deposited by the Applicant. The decision allowed the appeal and acknowledged the classification of both 'Milk Shake Mixes' and 'Fruit Syrups' as per the Applicants' claims until the appeal's final resolution.