Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cash refund of unutilized credit was admissible when the assessee had closed its factory and surrendered its excise licence, instead of granting the amount only as Cenvat credit.
Analysis: The relevant notification granted one-time deemed credit subject to the filing requirement, and the dispute centered on the form of relief after closure of the factory. Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was relied upon to hold that, where manufacture had ceased and the factory had been closed, the rules did not expressly prohibit refund of unutilized credit in cash. The Tribunal applied the ratio that cash refund is permissible when the assessee goes out of the credit scheme or the factory is closed.
Conclusion: Cash refund was admissible. The restriction applied to the credit-form refund was unsustainable, and the assessee succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where unutilized credit remains after closure of the factory and the rules do not expressly bar such relief, cash refund of the credit is admissible.