Exemption for thin clients remanded after failure to consider binding circular and relevant precedent.

Denial of exemption for thin clients without hard disk drives under Notification No. 6/2002-CE was set aside because the adjudicating authority had not considered the final CBEC circular dated 15.06.2007 clarifying that a CPU need not necessarily have a hard disk drive to qualify, nor the Tribunal decision relied on by the assessee. The authority also relied on a document disowned by the assessee, leaving the factual basis incomplete and disputed. Fresh adjudication was therefore required with consideration of the relevant circular, precedent and a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The matter was remanded for reconsideration, and the exemption issue was left open.

---

---

Issues: Whether the denial of exemption under Notification No. 6/2002-CE for thin clients without hard disk drives could be sustained when the Board's final circular and relevant Tribunal decision were not considered, and whether the matter required remand for fresh adjudication.

Analysis: The existing adjudication was found incomplete because the authority had rejected the earlier draft circular merely as a draft, had not examined the final CBEC circular dated 15.06.2007 clarifying that a CPU need not necessarily have a hard disk drive to qualify for the notification benefit, and had also not considered the Tribunal's decision relied upon by the assessee. The adjudicating authority was further found to have relied on a document disowned by the assessee. In these circumstances, fresh consideration was necessary after taking the relevant circular and precedent into account and after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Conclusion: The matter was remanded for fresh adjudication and the earlier orders were set aside.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was not finally determined on merits, and the exemption question was left open for reconsideration by the lower authority.

Ratio Decidendi: Where relevant binding circulars and material precedent have not been considered in adjudication, and the factual basis relied upon is incomplete or disputed, the proper course is to set aside the order and remand the matter for fresh decision after due hearing.

---