1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Upholds Classification of Rubberised Nylon Tyre Cord Fabrics, Limits Duty Liability</h1> The Tribunal upheld the classification of Rubberised Nylon Tyre Cord Fabrics under Chapter Heading 59.06, following precedent. The recovery of Additional ... Rubberised Nylon Tyre Cord Fabrics (RNTCF) - Appellate Tribunal - Duties Issues: Recovery of Basic Excise Duty (BED) and Additional Excise Duty (AED) on 'Rubberised Nylon Tyre Cord Fabrics' (RNTCF) used as input in manufacturing exempted Tyres for Animal Drawn Vehicles.Summary:The appeals were filed against Orders-in Appeal u/s 92/2005-CE dated 29-3-2005 and 03/2006-CE dated 9-1-2006 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mangalore. The issue pertained to the recovery of BED and AED on RNTCF used in manufacturing exempted Tyres for Animal Drawn Vehicles. The Adjudicating Authority confirmed the demands, which were later re-quantified by the Commissioner (Appeals) under CH 59.06, restricting the duty liability to BED only. The appellants raised contentions regarding the marketability of RNTCF.Upon careful consideration, it was found that the excisability and classification of RNTCF had been settled by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of MRF Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the classification of RNTCF under Chapter Heading 59.06, as per previous judgments. The Tribunal rejected the appellants' request to keep the issue of marketability open for future cases, stating it was not within their purview to decide on potential future issues. The impugned orders were upheld as the classification of RNTCF under CH 59.06 rendered AED not leviable. The appeals were rejected.The Tribunal's decision was pronounced in open Court on 19-6-2008.