Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rubberised Nylon Tyre Cord Fabrics were classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.06, whether the goods were excisable and marketable, and whether the duty demand and denial of exemption required interference.
Analysis: The classification and excisability of Rubberised Tyre Cord Fabrics were treated as settled by the Supreme Court authority relied upon in the order. The goods were held to fall under Chapter Heading 59.06, and the Tribunal noted that no earlier decision had treated the item as non-excisable. The plea to keep the question of marketability open for future cases was rejected because the Tribunal confined itself to the issues arising in the present appeal. Since the classification under Chapter Heading 59.06 governed the duty position, Additional Excise Duty was not leviable, but the quantified Basic Excise Duty demand based on the upheld classification suffered from no infirmity.
Conclusion: The challenge to the classification and consequential duty confirmation failed, and the Tribunal upheld the impugned orders.