Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant had made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty and stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: Duty had been confirmed on the view that the imported antenna sub-system was not an antenna eligible for exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus. dated 1-3-2005. The appellant relied on the product literature and on the treatment accorded to similar imports under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. dated 1-3-2002. In view of these materials, a strong prima facie case was made out for interim relief.
Conclusion: Waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed pending the appeal.