Manufacture under Section XVI Note 6 and time-bar plea supported stay of recovery in excise dispute.

Processes of blackening, buffing, final inspection and packing were examined for whether they amounted prima facie to manufacture under Note 6 of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The analysis applied the principle that a process converting an incomplete or semi-finished article into a complete product, and bringing out its essential characteristics, may constitute manufacture; on that prima facie view, the processes appeared to alter the character of the inputs and create the final product. Limitation was also considered: the show cause notice was issued long after the relevant period, and the facts were stated to be within departmental knowledge, supporting a prima facie time-bar. Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted.

---

---

Issues: Whether the processes of blackening, buffing, final inspection and packing carried out on received goods amounted, prima facie, to manufacture under Note 6 of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff Act, and whether the demand was prima facie barred by limitation.

Analysis: Note 6 of Section XVI was invoked for the proposition that a process which brings into existence the essential characteristics of a final product, by converting an incomplete or semi-finished article into a complete one, is to be treated as manufacture. The order records that this contention was not answered in the adjudication and, on a prima facie view, the processes altered the character of the inputs and brought into existence the essential characteristics of the final product. On limitation, the show cause notice was issued long after the relevant period, while the facts were stated to be within the Department's knowledge, supporting a prima facie plea of time-bar.

Conclusion: The appellants made out a prima facie strong case on manufacture and limitation, warranting waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery.

---