Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of the confiscated amount was liable to be sanctioned to the appellant when the Tribunal's earlier order setting aside confiscation and penalty had not been stayed by the High Court.
Analysis: In the absence of any stay of the Tribunal's final order, the appellate order setting aside confiscation of Indian currency and personal penalty remained operative. The Commissioner (Appeals) had no basis to remand the matter for fresh decision merely because the Revenue's challenge was pending, particularly when the lower appellate authority sought to rely on a circular instead of giving effect to the subsisting tribunal order. Once the order of adjudication had been set aside, the amount could not be retained and was required to be refunded.
Conclusion: The refund was rightly payable to the appellant and the remand order was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the impugned order was set aside, with refund directed to be sanctioned in accordance with the Tribunal's earlier order.
Ratio Decidendi: When an appellate order setting aside confiscation or penalty remains operative and no stay is granted, the consequential refund cannot be withheld or remitted for reconsideration merely because a further appeal is pending.