Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rebate amount could be appropriated against outstanding Government dues of the previous owner by invoking the recovery notice issued under Section 142 of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The purchaser had acquired only the assets in public auction and had not taken over the liabilities of the earlier company. However, a notice for recovery of Government dues had been issued to the purchaser, and no stay order was produced against that notice. In these circumstances, the appropriation of the sanctioned amount against the pending dues was treated as valid, and the Commissioner (Appeals) was held to have erred in setting aside the adjudication order.
Conclusion: The appropriation of the amount against the dues was upheld and the challenge to the recovery action failed.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue succeeded, and the adjudication orders restoring the appropriation were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a valid recovery notice for Government dues remains operative and no stay is shown, the amount payable to the claimant may be adjusted against the outstanding dues in accordance with the statutory recovery provisions.