1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeals allowed emphasizing natural justice principles, duty confirmed against proprietary concern</h1> The appeals were allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the significance of upholding natural justice principles, fair hearings, and timely decision-making ... Natural justice - Adjournment, non-grant of Issues:1. Duty confirmed against proprietary concern for diversion of imported fabrics.2. Allegations of non-clearance of export products and clearance of waste cloth/garments.3. Issue of adjournment requests and rejection leading to the passing of the impugned order.4. Delay in issuing the order and the need for fresh decision by the Commissioner.Analysis:Issue 1:The duty was confirmed against the proprietary concern due to the diversion of duty-free imported polyester fabrics meant for manufacturing export products to the local market. The department's case included non-clearance of export products to other units and clearance of waste cloth/garments to non-existent parties. The grievance of the appellants was related to the contravention of natural justice principles.Issue 2:Regarding the non-clearance of export products and clearance of waste cloth/garments, the case was based on the absence of re-warehousing certificates and statements from officials. The department's argument focused on the diversion of goods and discrepancies in the clearance process to different entities.Issue 3:The issue of adjournment requests and rejection leading to the passing of the impugned order arose when the assessee requested multiple adjournments for personal hearings. Despite reasonable requests for adjournment due to genuine reasons, the Commissioner proceeded to pass the order, leading to concerns about the fairness of the process.Issue 4:The delay in issuing the order and the subsequent need for a fresh decision by the Commissioner highlighted the importance of timely proceedings and the right to be heard before passing judgments. The delay in issuing the order after it was passed raised questions about the interests of justice and the need for a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their defense.In conclusion, the appeals were allowed by way of remand, emphasizing the significance of upholding natural justice principles, fair hearings, and timely decision-making in legal proceedings.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
