Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Rootz Oil was classifiable as Hair Oil under sub-heading 3305.99 or as Ayurvedic medicine under sub-heading 3003.39.
Analysis: The product was manufactured under a drug-control licence, used ingredients and herbs specified in recognised Ayurvedic texts, and was supported by certificates, affidavits, and clinical material indicating use for treating hair and scalp ailments such as alopecia, dandruff, graying of hair, itching of the scalp, and improving blood circulation to hair follicles. The reasoning followed the Larger Bench view that manufacture in accordance with authoritative Ayurvedic books and under a drug-control licence supports classification as an Ayurvedic medicine, and also relied on the principle that therapeutic and prophylactic value is material to determining whether the product is a medicament.
Conclusion: Rootz Oil was held to be an Ayurvedic medicine and not merely Hair Oil, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A product manufactured with ingredients from recognised Ayurvedic texts, under a drug-control licence, and shown to possess therapeutic and prophylactic value for treating ailments is classifiable as an Ayurvedic medicament rather than as a cosmetic or hair oil.