Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether synthetic soft drink concentrate was classifiable under Heading 2108.10, Heading 2108.99, or alternatively under Heading 3302 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the correct tariff classification of the product. The lower authority had not recorded any finding on the assessee's alternate claim under Heading 3302, although that claim required consideration. In these circumstances, the existing order could not be sustained and the matter had to be sent back for a fresh determination on classification after giving the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Conclusion: The appeal succeeded to the extent that the impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh decision on classification.