Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of the disputed duty demand.
Analysis: The Tribunal formed a prima facie view that weighing machines and conveyors were not covered by Serial No. 16 of List No. 9 under Notification No. 6/2002 and that the cited precedent was distinguishable on facts. In view of that tentative conclusion, full waiver was not granted, but partial relief was considered appropriate on deposit of a substantial amount.
Conclusion: Partial waiver of pre-deposit was granted, subject to deposit of Rs. 1,50,000, and recovery of the balance duty was stayed pending disposal of the appeal.