Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the concessional benefit under Notification No. 25/2002-Customs could be denied in respect of manuals, instructions and drawings imported along with machinery and treated as part of the value of the machinery.
Analysis: The imported documents relating to the functioning of the machine were not separate goods capable of independent classification under Chapter 49. The dispute was treated as one concerning valuation of the machinery already imported, and the value of licence-related material connected with the machinery could be included in that valuation. Since the jurisdictional certificate confirmed use of the machinery for the intended purpose, the value of the documents, being treated as part of the machinery, could not be singled out for denial of the concessional notification benefit applicable to the machinery.
Conclusion: The denial of the concessional benefit was unsustainable, and the appellant was entitled to relief.