Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 18/95-C.E. dated 16-3-95 in respect of micro cellular rubber sheets cleared for use in the manufacture of soles, heels or soles and heels combined for footwear.
Analysis: The goods manufactured by the respondent were covered by the exemption notification, which extended relief where the goods were used in the manufacture of soles, heels or soles and heels combined for footwear. The record did not contain evidence to show that the goods were not so used. The earlier Tribunal decision on the same notification and similar facts supported the respondent's claim to exemption.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification and the appeal failed.