Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the subject goods were liable to assessment under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the basis of maximum retail price, or whether they were correctly assessed under section 4 of that Act.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the binding Larger Bench ruling on cosmetic goods sold by weight or volume and noted that small quantities packed in sachets were exempt under Rule 34(b) of the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodity) Rules, 1977 from the requirement of declaring retail sale price. On that basis, section 4A could not be invoked where the goods, as cleared, fell within the exemption from MRP declaration. The subject goods were treated as goods required to be sold by weight and therefore entitled to the same exemption.
Conclusion: The goods were not assessable under section 4A and the assessment under section 4 was sustained; the Revenue's challenge failed.