Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether deemed credit on aluminium shots was admissible when the duty paid on aluminium ingots had not been credited by either the manufacturer or the job worker and the goods were processed through job work under intimation under Rule 57F(2).
Analysis: The duty rate on aluminium ingots and aluminium shots was the same and both were classifiable under unwrought aluminium. The quantity of aluminium shots produced from the ingots could not exceed the quantity of ingots on which duty had already been paid, and the appellants were otherwise entitled to credit of that duty. In these circumstances, the taking of deemed credit on the aluminium shots did not result in availment of credit beyond what was legitimately available on the ingots. The situation was therefore revenue neutral.
Conclusion: The deemed credit could not be denied, as no excess credit had been taken and the impugned order was unsustainable.