TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal reconsiders excise duty on chemicals used in photography, orders detailed review</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MUMBAI-V Versus RAMNORD RESEARCH LAB. PVT. LTD.</h3> COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., MUMBAI-V Versus RAMNORD RESEARCH LAB. PVT. LTD. - 2009 (233) E.L.T. 419 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues:1. Rectification of mistake regarding the applicability of Notification No. 264/76 to cinematographic film.2. Exemption under Notification No. 264/76 for chemical solutions classified under Chapter 37.3. Need for a detailed reconsideration of the applicability and exciseability of the chemical solution.Analysis:1. The Revenue filed an application for rectification of mistake against a Final Order, arguing that Notification No. 264/76 was erroneously applied to cinematographic film instead of still photography. The Tribunal had previously ruled in favor of the appellants, exempting silver residue and chemical solution under the said Notification. However, the Revenue did not contest the exemption of silver residue under a different notification. The Tribunal acknowledged the error in applying the notification to cinematographic film and noted the absence of findings on the issue of limitation.2. The Tribunal recognized that Notification No. 264/76 pertained to photographic uses under Chapter 37 and not cinematographic films. The order exempted chemical solutions falling under Chapter 37.07 based on the notification's provisions. However, the Tribunal identified an error in the application of the notification to cinematographic films. The Tribunal decided that a detailed reevaluation of the issue was necessary, indicating a need to revisit the question of applicability and exciseability of the chemical solution.3. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that a thorough reexamination of the entire issue was warranted. The previous order was recalled, and the appeal was restored for further consideration. The Tribunal directed the Registry to list the appeal for a final hearing to address the issues concerning the applicability and exciseability of the chemical solution comprehensively. This decision aimed to ensure a detailed review of the matter to rectify any errors and provide a fair and accurate judgment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
