Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on goods imported after the amendment to Rule 57Q, where the goods did not fall under the specified chapter heading or within the amended definition of capital goods.
Analysis: The amendment to Rule 57Q by Notification No. 14/96 was treated in the earlier case law as clarificatory and retrospective, but that principle did not assist the appellant because the goods in question were imported after the amendment. Once the amended definition applied, entitlement depended on the goods falling within the specified chapter heading or as parts and accessories of the goods covered by the rule. The appellant did not establish that position.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible, and the denial of credit was sustained.